Search: Site   Web
Gazette Film Blog ~

Reader says Brandon’s review betrayed her

June 29th, 2009, 3:31 pm · 6 Comments · posted by wepstein

Mr. Fibbs, last weekend I was looking for a movie to go to with my visiting sister, her 19 year old son (homeschooled, innocent) and my 80 year old mother. I didn’t know much about any movies out right now, so I looked at your movie reviews. Looked at all your reviews, and read your full page info on “Away We Go”. I deeply regret reading this, because I believed that this was a good movie by your rave review.

I was appalled at the first scene of oral sex and him talking about how she tasted. My sister and her son-at her sons request -got up and left to go to a different movie at that time. My mother, husband and I decided to stay, hoping this was not going to be the tone of the whole movie. It got worse with the woman screaming about her boobs that reached to her feet, the woman breast feeding her 2 boys ages 4years and 2 years, and we got up and left when it started talking about sea horse mating rituals. I’m sorry, but when did sick, depraved humor and strong sexual content and language amount to a A+ movie??????? Granted, it was rated R, but so is every other movie nowadays, and I have never been so offended by an R rated movie. If this is what you consider a great movie, I will NEVER look at your reviews again.

By the way, I looked at your bio and saw that you write for Christianity Today. Wow, I don’t get that.

You have a responsibility to let the readers know when movies are as twisted as this one, especially if you claim to be a Christian.

Sincerely,

Rose, Alex, Jean, Val and Joe

BRANDON’S RESPONSE:

Rose,

I’m sorry you feel I steered you so wrong. It is always so hard knowing what to warn people about and what can go unsaid. Believe me, it is very different for different people. I usually trust that people look to critics for insight into the technical and artistic aspects of the production and investigate on their own the MPAA’s rating (which did warn of language and sexual content for this film). Generally, I will warn Gazette audiences only when the offensive material is so beyond the norm as to shock even those who might be used to such material.

As someone who watches half a dozen films a week, I can tell you that “Away We Go” is actually quite tame. Don’t get me wrong, I respect your position and am not lessening your disgust or offense. It is simply to say that, if I’m reading between the lines of your letter correctly, you don’t go to R-rated movies all that often and trust me, there are plenty out there from which you and I would walk away disgusted.

For me, films with objectionable content can still earn a high rating if what they are showing is truthful and strives for a higher purpose than base carnality. If they are showing depravity for depravity’s sake, then I am no more interested in watching it than you are. But if the situation speaks the truth, is authentic and reflects life as it really is, not how some might wish it to be, then I respect and often reward that. That doesn’t mean we must all like or endorse the film, but it certainly doesn’t disqualify it as being automatically worthless as you would seem to suggest.

You’re right, I do also write for Christianity Today and I “wear” a very different hat when reviewing films there. CT requests a run down of offensive material in a way that a secular newspaper does not require. My friend Lisa, who reviewed the film for CT, could have spared you the time and money as she altered her readers to the very things that concern you.

I apologize that you feel you were misled and that members of your family were also offended. If you so chose to never consult my reviews again, I understand and can point you to several critics who may be more up your alley. Might I suggest my friend Jim Judy who runs just the sort of service you might be interested in at www.Screenit.com.

I hope you find what you’re looking for, if not with me, then with others. I suggest you use my or any other critic’s review as a jumping off point but not the end all and be all of your research.

Good luck,

Brandon

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Posted in: Uncategorized
 
ADVERTISEMENT

 6 Comments

  • PJ says:

    I would LOVE to know what sort of bubble that Rose, Alex, Jean, Val and Joe live in. It must be full of butterflies and unicorns! No one ever says any naughty words … and poo smells like candy!

    These people seriously need to grow up … live in the real world and stop living their “I’m so entitled to be offended” lifestyle. Ugh — people like you totally disgust me.

  • Larry Smith says:

    Brandon’s reviews are consitantley off the mark. Away We Go was the last one I will ever read let alone follow. It is not because he doesn’t ID the objectionable material, it is that he doesn’t know movies. The Proposal was banned by him. It was great. Away We Go was great according to him. It was poor…my wife said it was the worst movie we ever say and we have been going to movies since the 1950’s. Fire him or at least have some other folks spell him off occationally.

  • Ruth says:

    I appreciate Brandon’s thoughtful reply to Rose. She was obviously caught off guard by the content of the movie, and I can somewhat sympathize with that, but her letter turned into a personal attack on Brandon and a questioning of his integrity–ironic, considering that she seemed to consider herself as having very high standards. To quote her own words: Wow, I don’t get that.

  • jlee42 says:

    hank you Rose for writing . I saved this review in my movie file to remind myself I want to see it when it shows up on 75c Tuesdays at the Picture Show, but now that I know the little surprises it contains, I’ll skip it. And thanks Brandon for your thoughtful reply. I really enjoy your reviews and am frequently tempted. However, I seldom go to the movies these days since, having long ago exited my 20s, I can rely upon current movies to be disappointing, or worse. Thank you Ted Turner for TCM.

  • wepstein says:

    I just saw the this weekend and had a few thoughts:

    1. It’s the best film I’ve seen this year, probably an Oscar contender.

    2. It’s the most moral film I’ve seen in a long time, about a couple wondering about their coming baby, their future, where they want to live … if they’re too messed up to bring a baby into this world. It’s also very, very funny.

    3. It’s probably the least offensive R-rated films I’ve seen in a while, based on lack of violence, sex and nudity. It does have some harsh language, but “The Hangover” would be considered more indicative of modern R-rated movies.

  • Nell Minow says:

    I liked Fibbs’ review and I liked his response to Rose even more. Rose and her family are entitled to their response (and I can well understand why a 19 year old boy would not want to see that movie with his mother — and might want his mother to think he did not want to see it at all), but for me, the depiction of that very intimate moment at the beginning of the film was very touching and real. I’d rather see that a dozen times than any of the smarmy PG-13s (and increasingly PGs) with consequenceless, snicker-filled, sexual content.

    I love movies and read a lot of reviews. Fibbs is one of the best. I give him four stars!

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
  • Archives

  • Categories

powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site